missile defence造句

Mr Putin has never liked America's missile defence, but seemed to acquiesce when Mr Bush quit the Anti-Ballistic missile (ABM) treaty in 2002.

Then, in September, he held out his hand to Russia by announcing a reconfiguration of America’s anti-missile defence system.

We should explore the potential for linking the us, Nato and Russia missile defence systems at an appropriate time... Both Nato and Russia have a wealth of experience in missile defence.

Although both sides denied it, this looks very much like a reward for Mr Obama's shift on missile defence-russia loathed the Bush plan (see article).

But to retain that advantage, America will need to harden its forward bases, invest in missile defence and submarines and counter China’s capacity in asymmetric electronic, cyber and space warfare.

If you believe him, Mr Putin's rage reflects his fear that the nuclear balance is being upset by Mr Bush's plan to put a limited missile defence system on Czech and Polish soil.

They recognise that the drive for missile defence on the part of the US means that they need to expand their nuclear capabilities in order to stay in the same place.

When North Korea fired a less far-flying missile over Japan in 1998, it provoked outrage, and pushed the country to join America in developing missile defences.

An EMP strike to reduce the efficiency of anti-missile defences followed by a 'proper' nuclear strike.

He recently told Russia that if it helps stop Iran going nuclear, America might drop the plan Russia loathes to station missile defences in Poland and the Czech Republic.