lose by造句

Did you lose by it?

Will the publisher lose by it?

You never lose by loving. You always lose by holding back.

You don't have anything to lose by continuing the hunt.

You have nothing to lose by telling the truth.

He had nothing to lose by carrying out a dead mother's hope.

“You have to have character, when you lose by five goals you can't leave crying, you have to go and work harder,” Mourinho said. “You never want to lose by these numbers.

Sure, it was a bad game on a bad pitch but to lose by a hand-ball was very disappointing.

Today's mobile platforms win and lose by the strength of their ecosystems of developers, service and content providers.

Moreover, they argue, the new tests would be paid for by the defendant, so the State of Alaska has nothing to lose by permitting them.

Whatever its hold-ups, China has more to gain than lose by playing a bigger role in the euro zone's rescue.

Aunt Hester thought that it would be nice for him to work, if he were quite sure not to lose by it.

“You have to have character, when you lose by five goals you can’t leave crying, you have to go and work harder,” Mourinho said.

He only helps others when he has something to lose by not doing so, making Mad Max one of the most beloved anti-heroes of all time.

If you have the facts on your side and honest conviction in your heart, your rarely lose by fighting for your idea all the way.

Although most folks say they want to hear what they can gain by taking your advice, they're actually more influenced by what they have to lose by not heeding it.

The more fundamental reason is that one has nothing to lose by not having a Chinese name. And for many, material gain is the basis by which things are judged and measured.

This is borne out by my notes from a meeting with Woody, during which he said: "we will gain more than we will lose by establishing an identity; my tendency would be to risk being more offensive."

Be sincere, and show people who you really are and how you feel. You can express even unpleasant truths graciously, so you have nothing to lose by being straightforward.

In its dispute with India, for example, it is the status quo power: it is happy with the present arrangements, so what has it to lose by talking for ever?