WS造句

Further discussion of this WS Security feature is beyond the scope of this introductory guide.

So, sometimes, to make this point in email messages, we've been saying "JAX-WS RI + Tango".

Some people think that Tango is a different stack than our JAX-WS RI stack.

If you want to start from a clean workspace, import the WS response template final interchange project.

Only an initial WS-Routing sender may insert a rev element for describing the reverse message path.

这与WS调用特别有关系，在WS调用中，由于契约在本质上是基于ASCII的，因此增加了交换的细节。

标准规范的定义是WS -CIM小组应完成的任务。

In other words, we are replacing the resource properties document with a JSON object and using HTTP methods in lieu of WS-RP methods.

(in all candor, I am the IBM technical lead and co-editor of the WS-ReliableMessaging specification, so I might be a little biased).

The failure message is self explanatory: "use=encoded" in the soapbind:body, soapbind:fault, soapbind:header or soapbind:headerfault is not considered conformant to the WS-I Profile.

A Profile conformance Report can also be created from the WS-I Testing Tool Analyzer to document a conformance claim in your WSDL documents.

This architecture USES WS-Security to provide end-to-end security and possibly non-repudiation (if the service persists the inbound message before removing security).

我们现在将通过一个简单的示例来说明在没有此功能的情况下WS - RM端点为何不能完成其工作。

坦白地讲，我是IBM技术领导人，也是WS - ReliableMessaging规范的编辑，因此我可能有点偏心。

Then the WS-I BP group decided to make even more changes to the WSDL schema, so it created what appears to be the best-practices version of this slippery schema.

失败消息是自我解释的：soapbind:body、soapbind:fault、soapbind:header或soapbind:headerfault 中的 "use=encoded"被认为是不遵守 WS-I 规范的。

此体系结构使用WS - Security来提供端到端安全和可能的不可否认*(如果服务在删除安全前保存入站消息)。